दिल्ली नगर निगम
भ्रष्टाचार का एक बड़ा खुलासा
अफसरों को करें खुश
और हो जाएँ मालामाल
यदि आपकी पहुँच अच्छी है,
यदि आपकी उठ-बैठ बड़े-बड़े लोगों के साथ है
तो निगम के लोग
आइये, खुद अपनी नज़रों से ही देख लीजिये
निगम की करतूत
आज आये दिन सुनने और देखने को मिलता है
उस गरीब के बने बनाये माकन को निगम के अफसरों ने बड़ी बेरहमी से तोड़ दिया
जो गरीब दिन भर की गाढ़ी कमाई से एक एक रुपया जोड़ जोड़ कर
अपने मकान की नींव रखा था
आज निगम ने उसे पूरा बनते ही बड़ी बेरहमी से तोड़ दिया
जो अपने ही घर में कोई छोटा मोटा घरेलु उद्योग लगाकर
अपना और अपने बच्छों का लालन पालन कर रहा था
उसके छोटे से मकान को निगम ने सील कर दिया.
ऐसे तो असंख्य उदहारण आपके पास स्वयं भी होंगे
पर आइये आज हम आपको दिखाते हैं कैसे एक ऊंची पहुँच वाला
भवन नियमों के सभी उल्लंघन करके भी
दिल्ली नगर निगम की नज़रों में आता ही नहीं है
ये है
एक मकान का दृश्य जहाँ व्यावसायिक गतिविधियाँ
जोरों शोरों से और खुलेआम चलायी जा रही हैअनगिनत कानूनी उलंघन - सरकारी ज़मीन पर अतिक्रमण, अवैध भवन निर्माण, रिहायशी मकान - फिर भी व्यावसायिक गतिविधियाँ /
व्यावसायिक कारोबार पूरे जोर शोर से जारी
सवाल बड़ा येही है
क्यों आखिर इन भवनों पर कोई कानूनी कार्यवाही नहीं की जा रही?
सूचना के अधिकार (Right to Information Act, 2005)
के तहत मांगी गयी जानकारी में जो
दिल्ली नगर निगम ने सूचित किया, उसे सिर्फ ध्यान से देखिये
आप स्वयं सब कुछ समझ जायेंगे
Please take a look at the following Government documents which may stun you
एम्० सी० डी० द्वारा जारी वह दस्तावेज़ जिसमे एम्० सी० डी० ने खुद माना कि
भवन संख्या B-48 एन० डी० एस० ई० पार्ट वन जो रिहाइश के लिए है उसमे
वर्ष 2001 से ही व्यावसायिक कारोबार चलाया जा रहा है
Look at the above document dated 20.06.2002 signed by
Shri Jagdish Sagar, the then Chairman, Delhi Vidyut Board
Delhi Vidyut Board had already penalized and burdened the property owner
with commercial tariff and penal charges as per rules.
Even Delhi Jal Board levied Commercial tariff on the property
But to hell with all !!!! the Building Department of MCD Central Zone
took no action even on such glaring deviations
In fact, why would they? ... is the only simple question which comes to every ones mind, and I hope each one of us understands this also.
These building owners have a pretty high profile - may be money, may be power, may be both, and hence MCD ignores initiating any action on these buildings.
In the instant case.
With the passage of time the said houses were rented out to different tenents who had been using the said building for commercial use but MCD, Central Zone, Building Department initiated no action on even such glaring deviations and violations of the MCD Building bye-laws
The above document speaks clearly that MCD Building Department
never ever had any intentions to agree to any such misuse of the said property.
Matter of prime importance is, despite the MCD area Inspectors report above which clearly says that the building was rented for office use, the admission of MCD officials themselves at several above documents that the building was being miused since 2001 & before (the report of the Area Inspector of MCD came in 2001), MCD was not initiating any action on the said buildings. Glaringly, this was an intentional and a deliberate act and move
on part of the MCD building department of Central Zone - reasons best known to them
It took several years for MCD, Central Zone, Building Deptt. to admit misuse in the said building. They agree that the said building was being misused - used for Paying Guest Accommodation. May have been advised by MCD to change the trade.
(Kindly look at the document below)
The building was being used as a paying guest accommodation even today
but surprisingly,
still MCD did not want to take any action
[look at the documents below]
MCD, Central Zone, Building Department agrees that
NO PERMISSION WAS EVER GRANTED
for running the Paying Guest Accommodation in the said building
and that, even then No action / prosecution was done
by the Building Department on the said property
[look at the documents below]
Use of Paying Guest Accommodation was
not mentioned in the Master Plan MPD 2021
Stull no action
[look at the documents below]
A formal complaint was lodged with the Building department
and also with the Dy. Commisioner, Central Zone, MCD asking them to explain reasons into why action was not being initiated in this case
[kindly see the reply of MCD, Building Department, Central Zone filed abovewhich says,
No action has been taken on your complaint dated 1.11.2008]
When everything failed
an RTI was filed to know whether any action was initiated at all on the property for the said violations of building bye-laws and despite Notice issued to the property in question through the Local Commissioner apointed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court.
[look at the document below]
Building Department, Central Zone, MCD issued notice to the said property owner on the directions of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court who appointed a local commissioner for carrying out a survey to assess the deviations and violations of building bye-laws
in a PIL matter (Writ Petition No.4369/2001). The survey report says:
1. there were infringement in set-backs
2. the portion of the building is being used for commercial purpose
still no action .......
Thanks to MCD, Central Zone, Building Department
Finally it agrees that the
Building No.B-48 NDSE-1 was booked for action
[look at the document below]
The said building was booked on 12.06.2002
for Action U/s 344 (1) and 343 on account of unauthorized construction,
but still no action on misuse
No fine imposed
No sealing orders
No Demolition actions
till date
[Look at the document above]
It says "Despite several attempts, demolition action could not be taken
due to non-availability of Police Force on all occasions."
Friends, Does it not smell fishy ???
When asked, How many times did MCD apply for Police Force
Look at the reply MCD below:
When asked, How many times was the Police Force refused?
See what MCD, Building Department, Central Zone has to say in their pleadings
[Look at the document below]
Look at the silly reply of MCD
Out of 72 requests for Police Force for the same area
only two requests were refused
meaning thereby, 70 times Police Force were made available
for demolition and sealing actions
But Still No action
Remember other properties, in huge numbers were sealed
and demolished in same area and in Delhi that belonged to common man
The matter was given to Chief Vigilance Commissioner for conducting a vigilance enquiry which you would be surprised to note that it has been kicked like a foot-ball and for the last several years is being kicked from one department to the other -
Net result - Zero
[Look at the letter sent by the Central Vigilance Commission to Vigilance deptt. MCD]
It says "No action taken report is required by CVC"
take action or not is your wish.
letter of enquiry sent indirectly to the wrong-doer
to investigate his own deeds
Ha! Ha!! Ha!!! Ha!!! Ha!!!
[Look at the document below]
A letter for taking action sent from MCD Vigilance deptt.
to Dy. Commissioner, MCD, Central Zone
This also may surprise U
- Complaint regarding Property No. B-48 NDSE-1, New Delhi-110049 was sent from Central Vigilance Commission to MCD Vigilance department for action vide their diary No. 349/2010-77861 dated 08.03.2010
- Vigilance department further forwarded the same complaint to the Dy. Commissioner, MCD, Central Zone, on 03.05.2010 vide their diary No. AD-II/Vig/SK/2010/2681 [after a delay of 2 months]
[Look at the document below]
Being kicked like a football from one deptt. to the other
although MCD admits that the letters have been received by them regularly but
Still No action
Why? is the only Big question which remains unanswered yet.
दोस्तों, मैं यहाँ पर बहुत साफ़ कर देना चाहता हूँ कि दोषी मकान वाले नहीं हैं| मेरी नज़रों में दोषी दिल्ली नगर निगम के वह अफसर और कर्मचारी हैं जिन्हों ने किसी न किसी बहाने पिछले लगभग पच्चीस सालों से हर तरह कि कार्यवाही ताल राखी है| इस कारण अब मेरा मकसद सिर्फ और सिर्फ उन दोषी अफसरों को ढून्ढ निकालना है जिन्होंने
बगैर किसी निजी स्वार्थ के तो ऐसा नहीं किया होगा|
आखिर दिल्ली नगर निगम में अफसर और कर्मचारी बैठे क्यों हैं? क्या इनका काम सिर्फ और सिर्फ अपने निजी स्वार्थ के पीछे कोई भी गैर कानूनी काम करते रहना है?
येही वह सवाल हैं जो अब तक सवाल ही बने रह गए हैं|
No comments:
Post a Comment