The building was being used as a paying guest accommodation even today
but surprisingly,
still MCD did not want to take any action
[look at the documents below]
MCD, Central Zone, Building Department agrees that
NO PERMISSION WAS EVER GRANTED
for running the Paying Guest Accommodation in the said building
and that, even then No action / prosecution was done
by the Building Department on the said property
[look at the documents below]
Use of Paying Guest Accommodation was
not mentioned in the Master Plan MPD 2021
Stull no action
[look at the documents below]
A formal complaint was lodged with the Building department
and also with the Dy. Commisioner, Central Zone, MCD asking them to explain reasons into why action was not being initiated in this case
[kindly see the reply of MCD, Building Department, Central Zone filed abovewhich says,
No action has been taken on your complaint dated 1.11.2008]
When everything failed
an RTI was filed to know whether any action was initiated at all on the property for the said violations of building bye-laws and despite Notice issued to the property in question through the Local Commissioner apointed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court.
[look at the document below]
Building Department, Central Zone, MCD issued notice to the said property owner on the directions of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court who appointed a local commissioner for carrying out a survey to assess the deviations and violations of building bye-laws
in a PIL matter (Writ Petition No.4369/2001). The survey report says:
1. there were infringement in set-backs
2. the portion of the building is being used for commercial purpose
still no action .......
Thanks to MCD, Central Zone, Building Department
Finally it agrees that the
Building No.B-48 NDSE-1 was booked for action
[look at the document below]
The said building was booked on 12.06.2002
for Action U/s 344 (1) and 343 on account of unauthorized construction,
but still no action on misuse
No fine imposed
No sealing orders
No Demolition actions
till date
[Look at the document above]
It says "Despite several attempts, demolition action could not be taken
due to non-availability of Police Force on all occasions."
Friends, Does it not smell fishy ???
When asked, How many times did MCD apply for Police Force
Look at the reply MCD below:
When asked, How many times was the Police Force refused?
See what MCD, Building Department, Central Zone has to say in their pleadings
[Look at the document below]
Look at the silly reply of MCD
Out of 72 requests for Police Force for the same area
only two requests were refused
meaning thereby, 70 times Police Force were made available
for demolition and sealing actions
But Still No action
Remember other properties, in huge numbers were sealed
and demolished in same area and in Delhi that belonged to common man
The matter was given to Chief Vigilance Commissioner for conducting a vigilance enquiry which you would be surprised to note that it has been kicked like a foot-ball and for the last several years is being kicked from one department to the other -
Net result - Zero
[Look at the letter sent by the Central Vigilance Commission to Vigilance deptt. MCD]
It says "No action taken report is required by CVC"
take action or not is your wish.
letter of enquiry sent indirectly to the wrong-doer
to investigate his own deeds
Ha! Ha!! Ha!!! Ha!!! Ha!!!
[Look at the document below]
A letter for taking action sent from MCD Vigilance deptt.
to Dy. Commissioner, MCD, Central Zone
This also may surprise U
- Complaint regarding Property No. B-48 NDSE-1, New Delhi-110049 was sent from Central Vigilance Commission to MCD Vigilance department for action vide their diary No. 349/2010-77861 dated 08.03.2010
- Vigilance department further forwarded the same complaint to the Dy. Commissioner, MCD, Central Zone, on 03.05.2010 vide their diary No. AD-II/Vig/SK/2010/2681 [after a delay of 2 months]
[Look at the document below]
Being kicked like a football from one deptt. to the other
although MCD admits that the letters have been received by them regularly but
Still No action
Why? is the only Big question which remains unanswered yet.
दोस्तों, मैं यहाँ पर बहुत साफ़ कर देना चाहता हूँ कि दोषी मकान वाले नहीं हैं| मेरी नज़रों में दोषी दिल्ली नगर निगम के वह अफसर और कर्मचारी हैं जिन्हों ने किसी न किसी बहाने पिछले लगभग पच्चीस सालों से हर तरह कि कार्यवाही ताल राखी है| इस कारण अब मेरा मकसद सिर्फ और सिर्फ उन दोषी अफसरों को ढून्ढ निकालना है जिन्होंने
बगैर किसी निजी स्वार्थ के तो ऐसा नहीं किया होगा|
आखिर दिल्ली नगर निगम में अफसर और कर्मचारी बैठे क्यों हैं? क्या इनका काम सिर्फ और सिर्फ अपने निजी स्वार्थ के पीछे कोई भी गैर कानूनी काम करते रहना है?
येही वह सवाल हैं जो अब तक सवाल ही बने रह गए हैं|
